Top Menu

The Percentage Of SEC FCPA Enforcement Actions That Also Involve A DOJ Component

percentage

In this recent Corporate Crime Reporter interview, former SEC FCPA Unit Chief Kara Brockmeyer was asked: “are you noticing since you left the SEC a shift to the Justice Department not joining the SEC as much on FCPA cases?”

Borckmeyer responded: “When you are at the government for a long period of time, you see the pendulum swing back and forth. Yes, we are in a period, particularly in the FCPA area, where we saw the Department of Justice step away from a number of cases that were SEC only FCPA enforcement actions. There was a period of time where the Department was on every case that the SEC brought in the FCPA area. Now, the Department seems to be picking their battles on where they want to expend their resources.”

What do the numbers actually show? As highlighted below, between 2010 and 2014 the DOJ was involved in approximately 70% of SEC enforcement actions. Between 2015 to the present, the DOJ was involved in approximately 40% of SEC enforcement actions. [Keep in mind that the universe of enforcement actions (i.e. the denominator) is not that large and each enforcement action comprises approximately 2% of the total]

Continue Reading

Do We Really Need C = T – O To Tell Us Things We Already Likely Know?

scratchhead

I recently came across Risk Advisory’s Corruption Challenges Index. In perhaps a dig at Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (see here for a recent post) Risk Advisory states:

“We’ve looked at a number of factors above and beyond the simple perceived local corruption threat, to give a more nuanced and balanced evaluation of where the real challenges of negotiating corruption risks lie. These factors include such things as levels of FCPA enforcement action and local industry risks, as well as how information flows affect a company’s ability to understand who exactly it’s dealing with; how media reporting can be slanted according to the publisher, for example, or the willingness of people to talk openly about the likelihood and frequency of requests for bribes.”

Sounds fairly sophisticated – or nuanced – shall I say; however my response to the Corruption Challenges Index is the same as my response to the Corruption Perceptions Index: does the compliance community really need surveys or formulas (such as C = T – O read more below) to tell us things we already likely know. (See here for the prior post).

Continue Reading

The Top Ten List Of FCPA Disgorgement Amounts

top ten

Everybody, it seems, likes “Top Ten” lists.

This post highlights the top ten corporate FCPA disgorgement (and prejudgment interest) amounts in FCPA history.

The list highlights net FCPA disgorgement (and prejudgment interest) amounts after consistently accounting for (unlike other lists out there) certain credits or deductions in enforcement actions for foreign law enforcement actions or forfeiture amounts paid to the DOJ in a parallel proceeding.

Continue Reading

Reasons Why Companies Are Still Landing In The Top Ten List

reasonswhy

This recent FCPA Blog post poses the question: “why are new companies still landing on the top ten list” and then links to its inaccurate / misleading top ten list (see here for a list that uses accurate and consistently applied math).

This post discusses six reasons why companies are still landing on the top ten list (or more generally resolving FCPA enforcement actions for nine-figure settlement amounts).

Continue Reading

Issues To Consider From The MTS Enforcement Action

Issues

This previous post went in-depth into the recent Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement action against Russia-based MTS for bribing alleged Uzbekistan telecom officials. As highlighted in this prior post, the overall $850 million FCPA settlement amount is the largest in history.

This post continues the analysis by highlighting additional issues to consider.

Timeline

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes