Top Menu

Former DOJ FCPA Unit Chief Duross On The “Sneaky Sh*t” Accounting Provisions And Other Things Heard On The Conference Circuit

duross2

As highlighted in prior posts here, here and here, it is always interesting when former DOJ or SEC FCPA enforcement officials travel the conference circuit and make statements that undermine or contradict things they said while at the DOJ or SEC.

From approximately 2010 to 2014, Charles Duross was the Chief of the DOJ’s FCPA Unit. Currently a partner at Morrison & Foerster, Duross recently appeared on a panel at this ABA event.

At approximately the 14:40 mark of the video, Duross mentioned the FCPA’s accounting provisions and called them “sneaky sh*t” and said that “everybody talks about the bribery piece, if your client is publicly traded what you care about is that thing [the accounting provisions] because it is the books and records and internal controls and the truth is – and I hope nobody from the SEC is in the room – the SEC has long left the moorings of what the statute actually means. […] The SEC has interpreted that today to mean that if there is anything that has ever gone wrong in your business period, like you have not devised and maintained an effective accounting control, its ridiculous, but that is the current status I am just telling you the practical sh*t.” (Duross used the “sh*t” word several times during his presentation).

Continue Reading

SEC Chair Clayton Says That “In Many Areas Of The World, Our [FCPA] Work May Not Be Having The Desired Effect”

Jay Clayton

These pages have long posed the question of whether the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been successful in achieving its objectives. (See here for a recent law review article titled “Has the FCPA Been Successful in Achieving Its Objectives” – see also here for FCPA Flash podcast episodes on the topic).

These pages have also long posed the question of whether country exits in the aftermath of FCPA scrutiny or enforcement are a good thing (as the government often seems to suggest) or rather a bad thing. (See here for numerous posts).

Yesterday, in this speech, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton discussed the same topics and offered candid observations that seemingly conflict with much of the government’s FCPA enforcement rhetoric over the last several years.

Continue Reading

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce On “Reasonableness Pants” And “Secret Law”

Peirce

This site is a big fan of SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and this post highlights two recent speeches she delivered. Neither of the speeches are FCPA specific, but both are indeed FCPA relevant.

In this speech, titled “Reasonableness Pants,” Peirce stated: “A strong enforcement program requires us—to draw from the admonition a judge recently gave to us in a matter before her—to “put on [our] reasonableness pants.” The SEC ought always to wear reasonableness pants, and I would like to talk today about what those reasonableness pants look like on a regulator.”

Continue Reading

Further To The SEC’s Inconsistent Approach To Enforcing The FCPA’s Books And Records And Internal Controls Provisions

inconistent

I recognize that I can be a creature of habit, but when an issue – such as the SEC’s inconsistent treatment of FCPA violations – is so frequent I will keep on writing about it. So here goes the umpteenth post on this issue. (See here for other examples).

A basic rule of law principle is consistency. In other words, the same legal violation ought to be sanctioned in the same way. When the same legal violation is sanctioned in materially different ways, trust and confidence in law enforcement is diminished.

However, there sure does seem to be a lack of consistency between how the SEC resolves Foreign Corrupt Practices Act books and records and internal controls violations.

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes