Top Menu

Issues To Consider From The Alere Enforcement Action

Issues

This prior post went in-depth into the recent Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (and related) enforcement action against Alere and this post continues the analysis by highlighting additional issues to consider.

“Then Some” Enforcement Action

The majority of SEC FCPA enforcement actions are “just” FCPA enforcement actions. However, the Alere enforcement action was a “then some” enforcement action as the majority of the enforcement action (and indeed the bulk of the overall $13 million settlement) concerned findings of other securities laws violations regarding revenue recognition and related practices.

While not common, “then some” FCPA enforcement actions are not unheard of either.

Continue Reading

FCPA And Then Some As Alere Resolves SEC Enforcement Action

alere

One instance of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act scrutiny that has attracted significant investor interest over the past few years (because it occurred in the context of an M&A transaction) involved Alere Inc.

As highlighted in this previous post, the company disclosed in August 2015 that it received an SEC subpoena inquiring about its foreign business practices. Thereafter, Alere announced that it would be acquired by Abbott in a $5.8 billion transaction.

Continue Reading

Friday Roundup

Roundup

A plethora of scrutiny alerts and updates and for the reading stack. It’s all here in the Friday Roundup.

Scrutiny Alerts and Updates

Unaoil Related

The disclosures keep coming from companies mentioned in the recent Unaoil media reports (see here for the prior post).

FMC Technologies, an oil and gas services company, recently disclosed:

“On March 28, 2016 we received an inquiry from the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) related to the DOJ’s investigation of whether certain services Unaoil S.A.M. provided to its clients, including FMC Technologies, violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We are cooperating with the DOJ’s inquiry and are conducting our own internal investigation.”

KBR, a company which resolved an FCPA enforcement action in 2009 concerning conduct in Nigeria , recently disclosed:

Continue Reading

The Sun Rose, A Dog Barked, And A Company Disclosed FCPA Scrutiny

dog bark

This is not the first post regarding this general topic (see here and here for prior posts), merely the most recent.

Has the general increase in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement over the past decade done anything to deter future FCPA violations? Why in this current era of purported increased FCPA compliance does there seem to be more, not less, FCPA inquiries?  Does effective compliance reduce FCPA scrutiny or does effective compliance uncover more FCPA issues?  If the latter, does that argue in favor of a compliance defense?

If every company hired FCPA counsel to do a thorough review of its world-wide operations – given the current enforcement theories – would 50% of companies find technical FCPA violations?  75%?  95%?  If the answer is any one of those numbers is that evidence of how corrupt business has become or is that evidence of how unhinged FCPA enforcement theories have become?

While pondering the above questions, do recognize that a company disclosing or otherwise being the subject of FCPA scrutiny has become as common as the sun rising and a dog barking (hence the picture).

This post highlights recent disclosures and scrutiny from just the past week involving the following companies: Fairmont Santrol, Platform Speciality Products, Alere, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals and Tabcorp.

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes