Top Menu

Compliance Professionals Should Take The Corruption Perceptions Index With A Grain Of Salt

January 25, 2022

In an annual non-event, Transparency International (TI) released its so-called Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) (see here). The CPI “ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption according to experts and business people. It relies on 13 independent data sources and uses a scale of zero to 100, where zero is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean.”

According to TI, the “data sources are collected by a variety of reputable institutions, including the World Bank and the World Economic Forum” and the “sources and surveys which make up the CPI are based on carefully designed and calibrated questionnaires, answered by experts and businesspeople.”

According to TI, this year’s CPI “reveals that corruption levels remain at a standstill worldwide” and “131 countries have made no significant progress against corruption over the last decade, and this year 27 countries are at a historic low in their CPI score.”

The CPI generates a lot of media coverage and is a popular tool for business organizations in ranking risk (and thus prioritizing compliance). However, for the reasons highlighted in this post compliance professionals should take the CPI with a grain of salt.

Continue Reading

From The Docket

January 24, 2022

As highlighted in this prior post, in 2016 Misonix made a voluntary disclosure to the DOJ and SEC to “inform both agencies that the Company may have had knowledge of certain business practices of the independent Chinese entity that distributes its products in China, which practices raise questions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.”

In 2017 Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co. Ltd. brought a variety of civil claims against Misonix concerning its business relationship with the company. Among the claims brought by Cicel was a breach of contract claim. Misonix acknowledged that it terminated the contract, but argued that it “was justified in doing so because of Misonix’s FCPA investigation” regarding Cicel. In response, Cicel claimed that the investigation “was a ruse for breaching the contract.”

As highlighted in this prior post, a judge allowed Cicel’s claim to proceed beyond the motion to dismiss stage.

Recently, a judge granted Misonix’s motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim. The decision (2022 WL 188994) provides a rare public view into the origin’s of Misonix’s scrutiny and investigation.

Continue Reading

Rewind: Remembering The DOJ’s Embarrassing Africa Sting Case

January 21, 2022

Twelve years ago this week, one of the most embarrassing DOJ FCPA enforcement actions began – an enforcement action that a federal court judge would ultimately call “a long and sad chapter in the annals of white collar criminal enforcement.”

In January 2010, DOJ announced criminal charges against 22 executives and employees of companies in the military and law enforcement products industry for engaging in a scheme to pay bribes to the minister of defense of an African country.

However, there was no actual involvement from any minister of defense. Rather, FBI agents, with the assistance of an individual who had already pleaded guilty to real, unrelated FCPA offenses (Richard Bistrong), posed as representatives of a Gabonese minister. While it was not the first use of proactive, undercover investigative techniques in an FCPA investigation, it was certainly the largest and most dramatic use of such techniques in the FCPA’s history, and the full force of the government’s surveillance capabilities were used against individuals from mostly small private companies located across America.

Continue Reading

This Is Why FCPA Inc. Needs A Common Language

January 20, 2022

For years, these pages have highlighted the need for a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act common language as to the basic question of “what is an FCPA enforcement action?” (See herehereherehere, here).

This article titled “A Common Language to Remedy Distorted FCPA Enforcement Statistics” exposes in detailed fashion various distorted FCPA enforcement statistics. As highlighted in the article, the absence of a FCPA common language has numerous negative effects including infecting nearly all FCPA enforcement statistics.

Continue Reading

Hats Off To Urofsky

January 18, 2022

Shearman & Sterling recently released its annual “Recent Trends and Patterns in the Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.”

Year in and year out, it is one of the best law firm generated FCPA year in review publications.

For years, Philip Urofsky (a former Assistant Chief of the DOJ Fraud Section where he handled FCPA matters) has been a primary author of the publication and in connection with this year’s release Urofsky announced that it would be his last “FCPA Trends and Patterns” publication as he is retiring.

Continue Reading