Assessing The SEC’s Individual Accountability Rhetoric

April 15, 2020

In announcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement action against Asante Berko earlier this week, the Chief of the SEC’s FCPA Unit stated: “individual accountability remains a key component to our FCPA enforcement efforts.” (See here for the prior post).

Such statements by FCPA enforcement officials are commonplace.

But what do the facts show? As highlighted below, since January 1, 2018 the SEC has brought 28 corporate FCPA enforcement actions against issuer companies. As the co-head of the SEC’s Enforcement Division rightly stated: “Of course, companies cannot engage in bribery without the actions of culpable individuals.” However, approximately 90% of these issuer enforcement actions have lacked, at least at present, any related SEC enforcement action against an individual. In other words, there has been no individual accountability for these alleged FCPA violations.

Set forth below is a list of SEC issuer enforcement actions since January 1, 2018 and whether the enforcement action resulted in any related individual charges by the SEC.

YEAR ISSUER ACTION INDIVIDUAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION
2018 Elbit Imaging No
2018 Kinross Gold No
2018 Dun & Bradstreet No
2018 Panasonic Yes
2018 Legg Mason No
2018 Beam No
2018 Credit Suisse No
2018 Sanofi No
2018 United Technologies No
2018 Petrobras No
2018 Stryker No
2018 Vantage Drilling No
2018 Eletrobras No
2018 Polycom No
2019 Cognizant Yes
2019 MTS No
2019 Fresenius No
2019 Telefonica Brasil No
2019 Walmart No
2019 TechnipFMC No
2019 Microsoft No
2019 Deutsche Bank No
2019 Juniper Networks No
2019 Quad Graphics No
2019 Barclays No
2019 Westport Fuel Systems Yes
2019 Ericsson No
2020 Cardinal Health No