An Interesting Statement
This site has long followed the criminal prosecution of four former Commonwealth Edison (“ComEd”) executives and associates based on allegations of attempting to influence and rewarding the former Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives in order to assist with the passage of legislation favorable to the electric utility company.
Bribery of a state politician is not ordinarily the type of conduct that results in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act issues.
However, ComEd (a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Exelon Corp) was an issuer (as was Exelon) and the FCPA has always been a law much broader than its name suggests because of the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions.
Courts Upholds FCPA Convictions Of Former ComEd Executives And Associates
As discussed in this prior post, in May 2023 a federal jury in Chicago found four former Commonwealth Edison (“ComEd”) executives and associates guilty on all counts charged, including conspiring to influence and reward the former Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives in order to assist with the passage of legislation favorable to the electric utility company, in addition to multiple bribery and record falsification charges. (See here for the DOJ release).
Bribery of a state politician is not ordinarily the type of conduct that results in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act issues.
However, ComEd (a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Exelon Corp) was an issuer (as was Exelon) and the FCPA has always been a law much broader than its name suggests because of the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions.
Indeed, the most serious (from a sentencing and fine perspective) criminal charges the four individuals were found guilty of were record falsification in violation of the FCPA.
Roundup Of Recent Non-FCPA, FCPA Enforcement Actions
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has always been a law much broader than its name suggests.
Sure, the FCPA contains anti-bribery provisions which concern foreign bribery.
Sure, the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions can be implicated in foreign bribery schemes.
However, the fact remains that most FCPA enforcement actions (that is enforcement actions that charge or find violations of the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions) have nothing to do with foreign bribery. For lack of a better term, these enforcement actions have longed been called non-FCPA, FCPA enforcement actions by this site.
By my count, in the last approximate 30 days (as the SEC’s fiscal year came to a close), the SEC announced eight such actions. (See here, here, here, here and here for previous posts).
This post rounds up the other non-FCPA, FCPA enforcement actions in recent days.
Former ComEd Executives And Associates Convicted Of FCPA Offenses
Earlier this week, a federal jury in Chicago found four former Commonwealth Edison (“ComEd”) executives and associates guilty on all counts charged, including conspiring to influence and reward the former Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives in order to assist with the passage of legislation favorable to the electric utility company, in addition to multiple bribery and record falsification charges. (See here for the DOJ release).
Bribery of a state politician is not ordinarily the type of conduct that results in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act issues.
However, ComEd (a majority-owned indirect subsidiary of Exelon Corp) was an issuer (as was Exelon) and the FCPA has always been a law much broader than its name suggests because of the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions.
Indeed, the most serious (from a sentencing and fine perspective) criminal charges the four individuals were found guilty of were record falsification in violation of the FCPA.
Query Why The SEC Did Not Bring A Books And Records Or Internal Controls Case Against Exelon In Connection With The ComEd Bribery Matter?
For years these pages have highlighted the SEC’s inconsistent approach to enforcing the books and records and internal controls provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. (See here, here, here, here, here, here and here for prior posts).
Unlike the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions, the FCPA’s accounting provisions are generic and generally require that issuers shall: (i) maintain books and records which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect issuer transactions and disposition of assets (the books and records provisions); and (ii) devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that transactions are properly authorized, recorded, and accounted for (the internal controls provisions).
The SEC frequently advances an enforcement theory akin to strict liability that goes something like this: if problematic conduct occurs within a subsidiary, the conduct becomes an issuer violation of the books and records because the subsidiary’s books and records are consolidated with the issuers for purpose of financial reporting as well as an internal controls violation because the subsidiary is subject to the issuer’s internal controls.