Top Menu

Deputy AG Rosenstein Assumes Causation In Calling The FCPA Pilot Program “Successful”

Assume

As long as there have been government programs, government officials have been inclined to proclaim the program a success.

For instance, last week in announcing the DOJ’s new “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein stated:  “The incentive system set forth in the Department’s FCPA Pilot Program motivates and rewards companies that want to do the right thing and voluntarily disclose misconduct. In the first year of the Pilot Program, the FCPA Unit received 22 voluntary disclosures, compared to 13 during the previous year.  In total, during the year and a half that the Pilot Program was in effect, the FCPA Unit received 30 voluntary disclosures, compared to 18 during the previous 18‑month period.”

As highlighted in this post, Rosenstein’s statement assumes causation – in other words that the supposed increase in voluntary disclosures was the result of the April 2016 Pilot Program.

Continue Reading

FCPA Flash – A Conversation With Leslie Caldwell (Former Ass’t AG, DOJ Criminal Division) About The DOJ’s New “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy”

Podcast Logo

The FCPA Flash podcast provides in an audio format the same fresh, candid, and informed commentary about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and related topics as readers have come to expect from written posts on FCPA Professor.

This FCPA Flash episode is a conversation with Leslie Caldwell. Caldwell is currently partner in the San Francisco and Silicon Valley offices of Latham & Watkins and previously served as the Assistant Attorney General of the DOJ’s Criminal Division. In this role, Caldwell was involved in implementing and promoting the DOJ’s April 2016 FCPA Pilot Program.

Continue Reading

In Depth: What You Need To Know About The DOJ’s “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy”

Need to know

This previous post highlighted the DOJ’s announcement of a new “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy” and this post contained a general observation regarding the announcement.

Future posts will continue to analyze and provide commentary on the “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.”

This post accepts the “FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy” for what it is and sets forth in Q&A format, based on the DOJ’s own information and other objective information in the public domain, what you need to know about the program.

Continue Reading

Statement On The DOJ’s New “Revised FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.”

Soapbox

As highlighted in this previous post, earlier today Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced that the DOJ issued a new “revised FCPA corproate enforcement policy.” (See here for the actual policy in the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual).

The following statement may be attributed to Professor Koehler.

Continue Reading

DOJ Announces A “Revised FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy”

Justice Dept

One of the best things ever written about the FCPA was penned nearly 35 years ago by Robert Primoff who stated: “The government has the option of deciding whether or not to prosecute.  For practitioners, however, the situation is intolerable.  We must be able to advise our clients as to whether their conduct violates the law, not whether this year’s crop of administrators is likely to enforce a particular alleged violation.  That would produce, in effect, a government of men and women rather than a government of law.”

Earlier today, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act space once again witnessed a government of individuals rather than law as the DOJ announced yet another non-binding FCPA enforcement policy document.

Several forthcoming posts will examine in greater detail the “revised FCPA corporate enforcement policy”, but for now set forth below are the relevant portions of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s speech. (See here for the actual new policy in the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual. Note: the new policy is 9-47.120, the other FCPA portions in the USAM have been there for years).

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes