Top Menu

“This Is Wrong” And “Callous” – CFTC Commissioner Unleashes On Enforcement Action Based On Record Keeping Issues During The Height Of Covid

Pham

This post has little to do with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act specifically.

However, during the early months of Covid in Spring 2020, this post highlighted how the standard in the FCPA’s internal controls (and books and records) provisions is “reasonable” and that “reasonable” (a term used throughout the law) contemplates a variety of factors including the circumstances in which conduct occurs.

Given that FCPA scrutiny tends to last 4 years on average – and given that conduct giving rise to FCPA scrutiny tends to be up to 5-10 years old – this site has more than once “wondered” how FCPA internal control and/or books and records “deficiencies” will be viewed in future FCPA enforcement actions for the general time period March 2020 – 2021 (or perhaps even 2022).

If this recent Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) enforcement action against Goldman Sachs is any indication, the answer is the government may not care about the real-world conditions during that time period.

Continue Reading

That Was Then, This Is Now

shrug

To best understand (and place in context) current SEC FCPA enforcement positions and policies, it is useful to understand past SEC FCPA enforcement positions and policies.

The year was 1981, the event was the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the speaker was Harold Williams, the Chairman of the SEC. The speech did not contain the standard disclaimer (i.e. I am just an individual and not speaking on behalf of the SEC), rather Williams specifically stated that his remarks “constitute a statement of the Commission’s policy.”

Williams focused his remarks (here) “solely to one major auditing development of recent years: the accounting provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977″ and stated that “the anxieties created by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act – among men and women of utmost good faith – have been, in my experience without equal.”

Williams tried to damper these anxieties and spoke about the scope of the provisions including when an enforcement action would be warranted.

Continue Reading

Duped By Certain China Subsidiary Employees, 3M Resolves A $6.5 Million Enforcement Action

3m

The SEC announced today that 3M resolved a $6.5 million Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement.

The basics are as follows.

Approximately 6-10 years ago, a former Marketing Manager of a 3M China-based subsidiary “secretly” provided “tourism activities” for Chinese health care officials.

The Marketing Manager “would create a travel itinerary that included various legitimate business, training and marketing activities for submission to 3M-China’s compliance personnel for approval,” however there were “alternate itineraries” that “consisted of various tourism activities at or near the location of the educational events.”

There is no suggestion that anyone at 3M headquarters knew of or approved of the conduct. Indeed, subsidiary employees, among other things, “falsified internal compliance documents that affirmatively denied and/or omitted mention of the Tourism Activities that were planned as part of the overseas trip.”

Continue Reading

That Was Then

THATWASTHEN

To best understand (and place in context) current SEC FCPA enforcement positions and policies, it is useful to understand past SEC FCPA enforcement positions and policies.

The year was 1981, the event was the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the speaker was Harold Williams, the Chairman of the SEC.

Williams focused his remarks (here) “solely to one major auditing development of recent years: the accounting provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977.”

Williams began has remarks as follows.

Continue Reading

A Further Reminder That The FCPA Has Always Been A Law Much Broader Than Its Name Suggests

reminder

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has always been a law much broader than its name suggests.

Sure, the FCPA contains anti-bribery provisions which concern foreign bribery.

Sure, the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions can be implicated in foreign bribery schemes.

However, the fact remains that most FCPA enforcement actions (that is enforcement actions that charge or find violations of the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions) have nothing to do with foreign bribery and these provisions are among the most generic legal provisions one can possibly find.

The latest example is this recent SEC enforcement action against Cantaloupe Inc. (a manufacturer and distributor of cashless payment devices which operated under the name USA Technologies Inc. prior to April 2021).

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes