Top Menu

In The Words of Stanley Sporkin

sporkin

Stanley Sporkin passed away in March 2020 and this prior post highlighted his contributions relevant to the enactment of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (he was the head of SEC enforcement during the mid-1970’s) as well as his advocacy for FCPA reform later in his career.

Recently the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit released this oral history of Sporkin.

As relevant to the FCPA, Sporkin stated:

Continue Reading

The FCPA Turns 42

42

Today our favorite statute, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, turns 42.

In signing the FCPA into law, President Jimmy Carter stated:

“I am pleased to sign into law S. 305, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and the Domestic and Foreign Investment Improved Disclosure Act of 1977. During my campaign for the Presidency, I repeatedly stressed the need for tough legislation to prohibit corporate bribery. S. 305 provides that necessary sanction. I share Congress’s belief that bribery is ethically repugnant and competitively unnecessary. Corrupt practices between corporations and public officials overseas undermine the integrity and stability of governments and harm our relations with other countries. Recent revelations of widespread overseas bribery have eroded public confidence in our basic institutions.

Continue Reading

Flashback To The Mid-1970’s Regarding The Demand Side

1970s

Previous posts here and here discussed the recently introduced Foreign Extortion Prevention Act which seeks to “prohibit a foreign official from demanding a bribe” by amending – not the FCPA – but rather 18 USC 201 (the so-called domestic bribery statute).

In introducing the bill, Representative John Curtis (R-UT), one of the co-sponsors, stated. “Currently, a business being extorted for a bribe can only say ‘I can’t pay you a bribe because it is illegal and I might get arrested.’ This long-overdue bill would enable them to add, ‘and so will you.”

This remark caused a mid-1970’s flashback because, as highlighted below, it largely mirrors the policy rationale of those who supported addressing the so-called foreign corporate payments through a disclosure approach and not the criminalization approach that ultimately became the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes